R1 is mainly open, on par with leading exclusive models, appears to have actually been trained at substantially lower expense, and is cheaper to utilize in regards to API gain access to, all of which point to an innovation that may change competitive characteristics in the field of Generative AI.
- IoT Analytics sees end users and AI applications providers as the biggest winners of these current advancements, while exclusive model companies stand to lose the most, based on worth chain analysis from the Generative AI Market Report 2025-2030 (published January 2025).


Why it matters

For providers to the generative AI value chain: Players along the (generative) AI worth chain might require to re-assess their worth proposals and line up to a possible reality of low-cost, lightweight, open-weight designs.
For generative AI adopters: DeepSeek R1 and other frontier designs that may follow present lower-cost alternatives for AI adoption.


Background: DeepSeek's R1 model rattles the markets

DeepSeek's R1 design rocked the stock markets. On January 23, 2025, China-based AI startup DeepSeek launched its open-source R1 thinking generative AI (GenAI) model. News about R1 quickly spread out, and by the start of stock trading on January 27, 2025, the market cap for numerous major innovation companies with large AI footprints had actually fallen dramatically given that then:

NVIDIA, a US-based chip designer and designer most known for its information center GPUs, dropped 18% in between the marketplace close on January 24 and the market close on February 3.
Microsoft, the leading hyperscaler in the cloud AI race with its Azure cloud services, dropped 7.5% (Jan 24-Feb 3).
Broadcom, a semiconductor company focusing on networking, broadband, and customized ASICs, dropped 11% (Jan 24-Feb 3).
Siemens Energy, a German energy innovation vendor that supplies energy services for data center operators, dropped 17.8% (Jan 24-Feb 3).


Market individuals, and specifically investors, reacted to the narrative that the design that DeepSeek launched is on par with innovative models, was allegedly trained on just a number of countless GPUs, and is open source. However, since that preliminary sell-off, reports and analysis shed some light on the preliminary hype.

The insights from this article are based on

Download a sample to get more information about the report structure, select definitions, select market information, additional information points, and trends.

DeepSeek R1: What do we know until now?

DeepSeek R1 is an affordable, cutting-edge reasoning model that equals top competitors while cultivating openness through openly available weights.

DeepSeek R1 is on par with leading thinking models. The largest DeepSeek R1 design (with 685 billion criteria) performance is on par or perhaps much better than a few of the leading models by US structure model suppliers. Benchmarks show that DeepSeek's R1 model performs on par or better than leading, more familiar designs like OpenAI's o1 and Anthropic's Claude 3.5 Sonnet.
DeepSeek was trained at a significantly lower cost-but not to the level that preliminary news suggested. Initial reports showed that the training costs were over $5.5 million, but the true worth of not just training but developing the design overall has actually been discussed because its release. According to semiconductor research study and consulting firm SemiAnalysis, the $5.5 million figure is only one aspect of the expenses, leaving out hardware costs, the salaries of the research and development group, and other elements.
DeepSeek's API prices is over 90% cheaper than OpenAI's. No matter the real cost to develop the design, DeepSeek is using a much cheaper proposal for utilizing its API: input and output tokens for DeepSeek R1 cost $0.55 per million and $2.19 per million, respectively, compared to OpenAI's $15 per million and $60 per million for its o1 model.
DeepSeek R1 is an innovative model. The related scientific paper launched by DeepSeekshows the methodologies utilized to establish R1 based upon V3: leveraging the mixture of experts (MoE) architecture, reinforcement knowing, and very innovative hardware optimization to develop designs needing less resources to train and likewise fewer resources to perform AI reasoning, causing its aforementioned API use costs.
DeepSeek is more open than the majority of its competitors. DeepSeek R1 is available for complimentary on platforms like HuggingFace or GitHub. While DeepSeek has made its weights available and supplied its training methods in its term paper, the original training code and data have actually not been made available for a knowledgeable person to build an equivalent design, consider defining an open-source AI system according to the Open Source Initiative (OSI). Though DeepSeek has actually been more open than other GenAI companies, R1 remains in the open-weight category when thinking about OSI standards. However, the release sparked interest outdoors source neighborhood: Hugging Face has actually launched an Open-R1 effort on Github to create a full reproduction of R1 by building the "missing pieces of the R1 pipeline," moving the design to totally open source so anybody can replicate and construct on top of it.
DeepSeek released effective small designs together with the significant R1 release. DeepSeek launched not just the significant large design with more than 680 billion specifications however also-as of this article-6 distilled models of DeepSeek R1. The designs range from 70B to 1.5 B, the latter fitting on many consumer-grade hardware. Since February 3, 2025, the models were downloaded more than 1 million times on HuggingFace alone.
DeepSeek R1 was perhaps trained on OpenAI's data. On January 29, 2025, reports shared that Microsoft is examining whether DeepSeek used OpenAI's API to train its designs (an offense of OpenAI's terms of service)- though the hyperscaler also added R1 to its Azure AI Foundry service.

Understanding the generative AI value chain

GenAI spending advantages a broad industry worth chain. The graphic above, based on research study for IoT Analytics' Generative AI Market Report 2025-2030 (launched January 2025), depicts crucial beneficiaries of GenAI spending across the worth chain. Companies along the worth chain consist of:

The end users - End users consist of customers and businesses that use a Generative AI application.
GenAI applications - Software vendors that consist of GenAI features in their products or deal standalone GenAI software. This consists of business software business like Salesforce, with its focus on Agentic AI, and start-ups particularly focusing on GenAI applications like Perplexity or Lovable.
Tier 1 beneficiaries - Providers of structure designs (e.g., OpenAI or Anthropic), model management platforms (e.g., AWS Sagemaker, Google Vertex or Microsoft Azure AI), information management tools (e.g., MongoDB or Snowflake), cloud computing and information center operations (e.g., Azure, AWS, Equinix or Digital Realty), AI experts and integration services (e.g., Accenture or Capgemini), and edge computing (e.g., Advantech or HPE).
Tier 2 recipients - Those whose services and products regularly support tier 1 services, consisting of suppliers of chips (e.g., NVIDIA or AMD), network and server equipment (e.g., Arista Networks, Huawei or Belden), server cooling innovations (e.g., Vertiv or Schneider Electric).
Tier 3 beneficiaries - Those whose items and services regularly support tier 2 services, such as companies of electronic style automation software suppliers for chip style (e.g., Cadence or Synopsis), semiconductor fabrication (e.g., TSMC), heat exchangers for cooling innovations, and electric grid technology (e.g., Siemens Energy or ABB).
Tier 4 beneficiaries and beyond - Companies that continue to support the tier above them, such as lithography systems (tier-4) needed for semiconductor fabrication devices (e.g., AMSL) or business that supply these providers (tier-5) with lithography optics (e.g., Zeiss).


Winners and losers along the generative AI value chain

The increase of models like DeepSeek R1 signifies a potential shift in the generative AI worth chain, challenging existing market characteristics and improving expectations for success and competitive advantage. If more designs with similar abilities emerge, certain players may benefit while others face increasing pressure.

Below, IoT Analytics examines the key winners and most likely losers based upon the developments introduced by DeepSeek R1 and the more comprehensive trend towards open, affordable models. This evaluation considers the potential long-lasting effect of such models on the value chain instead of the immediate impacts of R1 alone.

Clear winners

End users

Why these innovations are positive: The availability of more and cheaper models will eventually decrease expenses for the end-users and make AI more available.
Why these innovations are negative: No clear argument.
Our take: DeepSeek represents AI development that eventually benefits completion users of this technology.


GenAI application companies

Why these developments are favorable: Startups developing applications on top of foundation designs will have more alternatives to choose from as more models come online. As specified above, DeepSeek R1 is without a doubt cheaper than OpenAI's o1 model, and though thinking models are rarely used in an application context, it shows that continuous developments and innovation improve the designs and make them cheaper.
Why these developments are negative: No clear argument.
Our take: The availability of more and cheaper models will eventually lower the cost of including GenAI features in applications.


Likely winners

Edge AI/edge calculating companies

Why these developments are positive: During Microsoft's current incomes call, Satya Nadella explained that "AI will be far more common," as more workloads will run locally. The distilled smaller sized models that DeepSeek released alongside the powerful R1 model are little sufficient to operate on lots of edge gadgets. While small, the 1.5 B, 7B, and 14B models are also comparably effective reasoning models. They can fit on a laptop and other less powerful gadgets, e.g., IPCs and industrial entrances. These distilled models have actually currently been downloaded from Hugging Face hundreds of countless times.
Why these innovations are unfavorable: No clear argument.
Our take: The distilled models of DeepSeek R1 that fit on less powerful hardware (70B and below) were downloaded more than 1 million times on HuggingFace alone. This reveals a strong interest in deploying models in your area. Edge computing manufacturers with edge AI services like Italy-based Eurotech, and coastalplainplants.org Taiwan-based Advantech will stand to profit. Chip business that focus on edge computing chips such as AMD, ARM, Qualcomm, or perhaps Intel, may also benefit. Nvidia likewise runs in this market section.


Note: IoT Analytics' SPS 2024 Event Report (published in January 2025) looks into the most recent industrial edge AI patterns, as seen at the SPS 2024 fair in Nuremberg, Germany.

Data management companies

Why these developments are positive: There is no AI without data. To develop applications utilizing open designs, adopters will require a plethora of data for training and during deployment, needing correct data management.
Why these developments are negative: No clear argument.
Our take: Data management is getting more crucial as the number of different AI models boosts. Data management business like MongoDB, Databricks and Snowflake as well as the particular offerings from hyperscalers will stand to profit.


GenAI services providers

Why these innovations are favorable: The sudden emergence of DeepSeek as a top gamer in the (western) AI community shows that the intricacy of GenAI will likely grow for a long time. The greater availability of different designs can cause more intricacy, driving more need for services.
Why these innovations are unfavorable: When leading models like DeepSeek R1 are available free of charge, the ease of experimentation and execution might restrict the need for combination services.
Our take: As new developments pertain to the marketplace, GenAI services demand increases as business attempt to understand how to best make use of open models for their business.


Neutral

Cloud computing companies

Why these innovations are positive: Cloud players rushed to include DeepSeek R1 in their model management platforms. Microsoft included it in their Azure AI Foundry, and AWS allowed it in Amazon Bedrock and Amazon Sagemaker. While the hyperscalers invest heavily in OpenAI and Anthropic (respectively), they are likewise model agnostic and enable hundreds of various models to be hosted natively in their design zoos. Training and fine-tuning will continue to happen in the cloud. However, as designs end up being more efficient, less investment (capital investment) will be needed, which will increase earnings margins for hyperscalers.
Why these innovations are negative: More designs are anticipated to be deployed at the edge as the edge ends up being more powerful and models more efficient. Inference is most likely to move towards the edge moving forward. The expense of training innovative designs is also anticipated to go down further.
Our take: Smaller, more effective designs are ending up being more crucial. This lowers the need for effective cloud computing both for training and inference which may be balanced out by higher general need and lower CAPEX requirements.


EDA Software suppliers

Why these innovations are positive: Demand for brand-new AI chip styles will increase as AI workloads end up being more specialized. EDA tools will be vital for designing efficient, smaller-scale chips tailored for edge and dispersed AI inference
Why these innovations are negative: The approach smaller, less resource-intensive designs might decrease the need for developing innovative, high-complexity chips optimized for huge information centers, potentially causing minimized licensing of EDA tools for high-performance GPUs and ASICs.
Our take: EDA software providers like Synopsys and Cadence could benefit in the long term as AI specialization grows and drives demand for brand-new chip designs for edge, customer, and inexpensive AI workloads. However, the industry might need to adjust to shifting requirements, focusing less on large data center GPUs and more on smaller sized, effective AI hardware.


Likely losers

AI chip business

Why these developments are positive: The presumably lower training expenses for designs like DeepSeek R1 could eventually increase the overall need for AI chips. Some described the Jevson paradox, the idea that performance results in more require for a resource. As the training and inference of AI models end up being more effective, the need might increase as greater performance results in decrease expenses. ASML CEO Christophe Fouquet shared a comparable line of thinking: "A lower expense of AI could indicate more applications, more applications suggests more need over time. We see that as an opportunity for more chips demand."
Why these innovations are negative: The supposedly lower expenses for DeepSeek R1 are based mainly on the requirement for less advanced GPUs for training. That puts some doubt on the sustainability of massive tasks (such as the recently revealed Stargate task) and the capital expenditure costs of tech companies mainly earmarked for buying AI chips.
Our take: IoT Analytics research for its most current Generative AI Market Report 2025-2030 (released January 2025) found that NVIDIA is leading the data center GPU market with a market share of 92%. NVIDIA's monopoly defines that market. However, that likewise reveals how highly NVIDA's faith is linked to the ongoing growth of costs on information center GPUs. If less hardware is needed to train and release designs, then this might seriously compromise NVIDIA's development story.


Other categories related to data centers (Networking devices, electrical grid technologies, electrical power suppliers, and heat exchangers)

Like AI chips, designs are most likely to end up being more affordable to train and more effective to deploy, so the expectation for further data center infrastructure build-out (e.g., networking equipment, cooling systems, and power supply solutions) would reduce appropriately. If fewer high-end GPUs are needed, large-capacity data centers might downsize their financial investments in associated infrastructure, possibly affecting need for supporting technologies. This would put pressure on companies that offer vital elements, most notably networking hardware, power systems, and cooling solutions.

Clear losers

Proprietary design providers

Why these developments are favorable: No clear argument.
Why these developments are negative: The GenAI companies that have collected billions of dollars of funding for their proprietary models, such as OpenAI and Anthropic, stand to lose. Even if they establish and release more open models, this would still cut into the profits circulation as it stands today. Further, while some framed DeepSeek as a "side job of some quants" (quantitative analysts), the release of DeepSeek's powerful V3 and after that R1 models proved far beyond that sentiment. The question going forward: What is the moat of exclusive model companies if innovative models like DeepSeek's are getting released for free and end up being totally open and fine-tunable?
Our take: DeepSeek released powerful designs totally free (for regional deployment) or extremely inexpensive (their API is an order of magnitude more affordable than comparable models). Companies like OpenAI, Anthropic, and Cohere will face progressively strong competitors from players that release free and customizable cutting-edge models, like Meta and DeepSeek.


Analyst takeaway and outlook

The emergence of DeepSeek R1 strengthens a crucial trend in the GenAI area: open-weight, cost-effective models are becoming feasible competitors to exclusive alternatives. This shift challenges market presumptions and forces AI service providers to reassess their worth propositions.

1. End users and GenAI application providers are the greatest winners.

Cheaper, premium designs like R1 lower AI adoption expenses, benefiting both business and customers. Startups such as Perplexity and Lovable, which develop applications on structure models, now have more choices and can substantially reduce API expenses (e.g., R1's API is over 90% less expensive than OpenAI's o1 design).

2. Most experts agree the stock market overreacted, but the innovation is genuine.

While significant AI stocks dropped sharply after R1's release (e.g., NVIDIA and Microsoft down 18% and 7.5%, respectively), numerous experts view this as an overreaction. However, DeepSeek R1 does mark a real advancement in cost effectiveness and openness, setting a precedent for future competition.

3. The dish for building top-tier AI models is open, speeding up competitors.

DeepSeek R1 has proven that releasing open weights and a detailed approach is helping success and caters to a growing open-source community. The AI landscape is continuing to shift from a couple of dominant exclusive gamers to a more competitive market where new entrants can develop on existing breakthroughs.

4. Proprietary AI providers face increasing pressure.

Companies like OpenAI, Anthropic, and Cohere must now distinguish beyond raw design performance. What remains their competitive moat? Some may shift towards enterprise-specific solutions, while others might check out hybrid business models.

5. AI infrastructure companies face mixed potential customers.

Cloud computing service providers like AWS and Microsoft Azure still gain from model training however face pressure as reasoning transfer to edge gadgets. Meanwhile, AI chipmakers like NVIDIA could see weaker demand for high-end GPUs if more designs are trained with less resources.

6. The GenAI market remains on a strong development path.

Despite disruptions, AI spending is expected to broaden. According to IoT Analytics' Generative AI Market Report 2025-2030, international costs on foundation models and platforms is predicted to grow at a CAGR of 52% through 2030, driven by enterprise adoption and ongoing effectiveness gains.

Final Thought:

DeepSeek R1 is not just a technical milestone-it signals a shift in the AI market's economics. The recipe for constructing strong AI designs is now more widely available, making sure higher competition and faster development. While exclusive models should adjust, AI application suppliers and end-users stand to benefit many.

Disclosure

Companies mentioned in this article-along with their products-are utilized as examples to showcase market advancements. No business paid or received favoritism in this post, and it is at the discretion of the expert to pick which examples are used. IoT Analytics makes efforts to differ the business and products pointed out to help shine attention to the numerous IoT and associated technology market gamers.

It deserves noting that IoT Analytics may have business relationships with some business pointed out in its short articles, as some business license IoT Analytics marketing research. However, for confidentiality, IoT Analytics can not disclose private relationships. Please contact compliance@iot-analytics.com for any questions or issues on this front.

More details and additional reading

Are you thinking about discovering more about Generative AI?

Generative AI Market Report 2025-2030

A 263-page report on the enterprise Generative AI market, incl. market sizing & projection, competitive landscape, end user adoption, patterns, challenges, and more.

Download the sample for more information about the report structure, select meanings, choose data, additional information points, patterns, and more.

Already a subscriber? View your reports here →

Related articles

You may also be interested in the following articles:

AI 2024 in evaluation: The 10 most significant AI stories of the year
What CEOs talked about in Q4 2024: Tariffs, reshoring, and agentic AI
The commercial software application market landscape: 7 key stats going into 2025
Who is winning the cloud AI race? Microsoft vs. AWS vs. Google


Related publications

You might also be interested in the following reports:

Industrial Software Landscape 2024-2030
Smart Factory Adoption Report 2024
Global Cloud Projects Report and Database 2024


Sign up for our newsletter and follow us on LinkedIn to remain up-to-date on the current trends shaping the IoT markets. For total business IoT coverage with access to all of IoT Analytics' paid content & reports, consisting of dedicated analyst time, take a look at the Enterprise membership.